Cornell Investigation

ITHACA, N.Y. (AP) — Cornell University President Michael Kotlikoff faced off with angry members of the school’s faculty Wednesday at a meeting that underscored deep frustration on campus over his administration’s handling of a woman’s report that she was gang raped at a fraternity house in 2024.

Kotlikoff addressed members of the university's Faculty Senate, and took their questions, as it began considering a no-confidence resolution in his administration.

The meeting was closed to the media, but some faculty members leaving the session described the mood as leaning heavily against Kotlikoff, who has publicly acknowledged errors in the school's handling of the rape allegation.

Richard Bensel, a professor of government, said Kotlikoff was poised and the debate was civil, but he estimated 80% of the faculty members present have lost confidence in the administration.

“The faculty were extremely angry. They gave him a hard time, I think appropriately so,” Bensel said. He said the Faculty Senate had spent years passing resolutions calling for reforms to university disciplinary procedures, only to have its recommendations ignored.

“I don’t think there’s any way that we can open up the process for democratic reform except by passing this resolution,” he said.

Debate was expected to continue Oct. 28, followed by electronic voting.

A no-confidence vote by the faculty would be largely symbolic, but could send a powerful message to the university's trustees, who ultimately decide how the university is run and who leads it.

Kotlikoff declined to speak to reporters after leaving the meeting.

Accuser's lawsuit has roiled campus

A woman identified in court documents by the pseudonym Jane Doe filed a lawsuit last month alleging that seven Chi Phi fraternity members sexually assaulted or exploited her in October 2024 and that Cornell mishandled her complaints.

All of those men have denied her allegations, saying either that their interactions with the woman were consensual or that they weren't involved.

The criminal investigation by Cornell's police department quickly stalled after the local district attorney decided, only weeks after the woman went to police in 2024, that no crime had been committed.

At the time, Kotlikoff publicly addressed what he called “deeply disturbing” allegations, suspended the fraternity and said criminal and university investigations were underway. He subsequently convened a presidential task force to examine how Cornell handles sexual assault.

But in an interview with The New York Times published Tuesday, Kotlikoff said he never followed up to learn what had happened to the woman or whether any of the accused students had been punished as part of the school's Title IX investigation.

He acknowledged that, until recently, he didn't know she had dropped out of Cornell or that students had been expelled or suspended over the incident, or that some had remained enrolled at the school.

On Tuesday, Kotlikoff announced a ban on fraternity parties through the end of the academic year and plans to give state police a role in investigating sexual assault reports.

Faculty describe ‘contentious’ meeting

Kotlikoff left the meeting after answering faculty questions and did not stay for the debate over the no-confidence resolution.

“The institution is split in significant ways,” said Grant Farred, professor of Africana Studies and English, describing those in the humanities as feeling they had enough information to proceed while those in the sciences wanted more data.

Iris Packman, a senior research and policy development associate at Cornell’s ILR School Climate Jobs Institute, said the meeting was “contentious” and Kotlikoff got “defensive.”

Labor history professor Paul Ortiz, lead sponsor of the no-confidence resolution, said Kotlikoff suggested that replacing the president would not be good for the university — though the resolution doesn't expressly call for his ouster.

“What was animating the resolution is this sense of a perpetual ongoing crisis,” said Ortiz.

Anne Marie Brady, a senior extension associate at Cornell’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations, said she welcomed Kotlikoff’s recent announcement that state police would take on a role in campus sexual assault investigations, but she questioned the timing, a day before the Senate debate.

Professor who reported harassment says it nearly cost her career

For Ariana Kim, an associate music professor at Cornell, Kotlikoff’s acknowledgment that he had not followed up on the woman’s case was “appalling.”

A Grammy-nominated violinist, Kim told The Associated Press that when she first started at Cornell a decade ago in her 20s, she experienced bullying and sexual harassment by senior colleagues. Cornell, she said, failed to properly document her complaints and never clearly informed her of what disciplinary action, if any, had been taken.

“I was asked what I had done to provoke the situation,” she said.

Kim said her efforts to avoid colleagues who had harassed her later became a point of criticism during her tenure review. In one instance, a senior professor cited her unwillingness to accept his advice and her avoidance of him in explaining his vote against granting her tenure.

Kim spent more than a year appealing the initial tenure denial, which was ultimately overturned.

Now seeking promotion to full professor, Kim said she feared publicly criticizing university leaders could again jeopardize her career.

Kotlikoff became the university’s interim president in July 2024 and took the job permanently last year.

He's faced challenges including a dining and custodial workers strike, ire over his decision last year to pay $60 million to settle Trump administration civil rights investigations, and accusations from campus activists that he tried to back his car into demonstrators following a debate over Israel and Palestinian rights. Kotlikoff denied the allegations, saying he was the victim of harassment.

—-

Willingham reported from Boston.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.