Nevada’s pardons board will not be able to consider a last-minute request from outgoing Gov. Steve Sisolak to commute the sentences of all 57 of the state’s death row prisoners, a judge ordered Monday evening.

The state Board of Pardons was set to vote on the request Tuesday morning, potentially delivering the second major victory in a week for advocates who have called for the abolition of capital punishment after Oregon Gov. Kate Brown used her executive clemency powers last Wednesday to commute the state's 17 death sentences.

Delivering his ruling from the bench, Carson City District Court Judge James Wilson Jr. said Nevada's pardons board, which includes the governor, has the authority to grant such commutations but failed to properly notify the families of victims before the meeting.

“I think that is required to show the capital murder victim fairness and respect for his or her dignity,” Wilson said. His order came in response to an emergency petition filed last week by Chris Hicks, the Republican district attorney in Reno, who criticized Sisolak’s request as “unjust and undemocratic.”

News of the judge's decision brought some comfort to Kenneth Cherry Sr., 63, whose son was killed in 2013 when death row prisoner Ammar Harris opened fire on the Las Vegas Strip, causing a fiery crash that left Kenneth Cherry Jr. and two others, including cab driver Michael Boldon, dead.

“It's impossible to move on knowing my son's murderer is still alive,” Cherry Sr. said Monday evening from his home in Oakland. “It's an unexplainable pain.”

And to rub salt in the wound, he said, he learned of Sisolak's request from Boldon's brother, who had read about it in the news.

“What they're doing to us is plain wrong,” Cherry Sr. said. “There has not been one day that my family hasn't suffered since my son was killed."

The pardons board will still meet Tuesday as scheduled but won't discuss the commutations.

A spokeswoman for the governor's office declined to comment Monday evening on the judge's order but said Sisolak will deliver remarks Tuesday at the meeting.

Sisolak confirmed last week that he wanted to clear the state's death row before he leaves office in two weeks by reducing the sentences of all inmates awaiting execution to life in prison without parole. He had hoped to garner enough support from pardons board members at their final meeting together before Republican Gov.-elect Joe Lombardo, the sheriff in Las Vegas since 2015, is sworn in and takes his place on the board.

The eleventh-hour request came as shock both to criminal justice reform advocates in Nevada, who said they were suspicious of the governor's timing, and to proponents of capital punishment, who accused Sisolak of executive overreach.

Last year, Democrats commanded majorities in both chambers of the statehouse and appeared to support abolishing the death penalty, but legislative efforts ultimately stalled after Sisolak voiced his opposition.

At the time, Democrats were anticipating crime would emerge as among the midterm election’s most potent partisan issues, but Sisolak denied to reporters that his reelection campaign figured into his decision to voice concerns about the bill.

Sisolak, a practicing Catholic whose daughter works as a public defender, said his views on capital punishment irrevocably changed after the mass shooting in Las Vegas in 2017.

Scott Coffee, a longtime public defender in Las Vegas who had supported the bill last year to abolish capital punishment, said Nevada's death penalty system is beyond repair.

“It's been a false promise to victims for too long,” he said. “To some extent, it's lip service to tell them that there will be some kind of retribution for the death of their loved ones when the reality is that it just doesn't happen."

Nevada has not executed a prisoner since 2006, and all but one of the 12 people executed since 1977, when the state reinstated capital punishment, had waived their appeals.

The ruling is in favor of Washoe County District Attorney Chris Hicks who was against the possible change. 

Governor-elect Joe Lombardo released the following statement on Carson City District Court Judge James Wilson’s ruling that the Nevada Board of Pardons cannot consider whether to commute all death sentences in Nevada to life in prison without parole.

“I'm thankful to Judge James Wilson for upholding the law, and I'm grateful that he protected the voter-approved constitutional rights of crime victims and their families. I'm relieved that justice has prevailed through Marsy's Law.”

-------------------------------------------------

Original Story from December 16:

The Nevada Board of Pardons is scheduled to discuss whether to commute all death sentences during a meeting next week.

If approved, those commuted death sentences would be changed to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

The December 20 meeting will consist of Governor Sisolak, the Justices of the Supreme Court and Nevada Attorney General Aaron D. Ford.

Daryl Mack was the last person put to death in Nevada, in 2006, for a 1988 rape and murder in Reno.

There are currently 57 inmates on death row.

Governor Sisolak's office told us, "The Governor believes this is a worthy item for the Commissioners to consider and will be voting in favor of the measure.

"The Governor has always said that capital punishment should be sought and used less often, and he believes this is an appropriate and necessary step forward in the ongoing conversation and discussion around capital punishment."

The Washoe County District Attorney's Office says they are against the change. 

In a statement, chief investigator Michelle Bays says, "I believe this action by the Governor, and the process in which it is being reviewed, ignores the complexity of an issue that has and ought to continue to be fairly decided by the people of Nevada. Moreover, it is uncaring to the families of the victims of these cases, whose rights seem to be irrelevant to some."

In a statement, Washoe County District Attorney Chris Hicks, says his office is strongly opposed to this change as well. 

“The Governor’s last-minute requested agenda item violates Nevada’s Constitution and its relevant statutes.

Moreover, it tramples upon the fundamental rights of crime victims and disregards due process in the law. Most importantly, the timing and nature of the added agenda item is an insult to those deceased victims who were tortured, raped, and slayed at the hands of the 57 heinous men on Nevada’s Death Row.

There is a democratic process to debate and consider issues related to the death penalty.

It has happened multiple times during past legislative sessions in Nevada. However, the proposed categorical elimination of 57 death sentences by a mere majority of an 8-member public body is unjust and undemocratic.

In response, my office filed a formal legal challenge to the agenda item in the First Judicial District Court this afternoon.”

(see below the emergency petition filed December 16 requesting a Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition of the the Board's planned action)

(see below for the motion filed December 16 requesting an emergency hearing and order shortening time regarding the agenda item)